🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the mythologized version circulated by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a tailor-made version of the president. This figure is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from disorder. While he is called a different name, the message is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, the president is presented as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with him to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a casting call with many candidates. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country in practice.

• The shortlist included various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his “recruitment work” in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier version prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with his appeared on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. His influence is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it might seek to question.