🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for using too much that system. Hire the project manager and then discard them for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.